高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

虚警率约束下基于噪声分数池阈值标定机制的DSSS信号智能检测

张韬 唐小妹 孙广富

张韬, 唐小妹, 孙广富. 虚警率约束下基于噪声分数池阈值标定机制的DSSS信号智能检测[J]. 电子与信息学报. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260414
引用本文: 张韬, 唐小妹, 孙广富. 虚警率约束下基于噪声分数池阈值标定机制的DSSS信号智能检测[J]. 电子与信息学报. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260414
ZHANG Tao, TANG Xiaomei, SUN Guangfu. Intelligent Detection of DSSS Signals Under False-Alarm Rate Constraints Based on a Noise Score-Pool Threshold Calibration Mechanism[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260414
Citation: ZHANG Tao, TANG Xiaomei, SUN Guangfu. Intelligent Detection of DSSS Signals Under False-Alarm Rate Constraints Based on a Noise Score-Pool Threshold Calibration Mechanism[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260414

虚警率约束下基于噪声分数池阈值标定机制的DSSS信号智能检测

doi: 10.11999/JEIT260414 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT260414
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目(62531025)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张韬:女,博士生,研究方向为卫星导航信号智能接收,邮箱为 17810228973@163.com

    唐小妹:女,研究员,研究方向为导航信号体制设计、导航安全对抗等,邮箱为 txm_nnc@126.com

    孙广富:男,研究员,研究方向为卫星导航技术等

    通讯作者:

    唐小妹 txm_nnc@126.com

  • 中图分类号: TN965.5

Intelligent Detection of DSSS Signals Under False-Alarm Rate Constraints Based on a Noise Score-Pool Threshold Calibration Mechanism

Funds: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62531025)
  • 摘要: 针对弱信号场景下导航直扩信号传统检测方法性能受限,以及现有深度学习检测模型普遍缺乏有效虚警率控制机制的问题,该文提出了一种虚警率可控的直扩信号深度学习检测方法。该方法创新性地提出了基于噪声分数池的检测阈值自适应标定机制,同时设计了适配I/Q信号一维序列输入的改进的残差神经网络。通过统计噪声数据集经网络处理后输出的置信度分数的经验分布,根据预设虚警率来标定检测判决阈值,从而将深度学习模型纳入经典的恒虚警率评估框架。此外,该文验证了有无归一化处理的数据预处理策略对弱信号检测的影响。仿真结果表明,该文所提模型整体检测性能较传统自相关方法提升3~4 dB,无归一化处理策略相较于归一化处理性能提升约1 dB。在非理想的高斯色噪声环境下,该模型同样展现出优于传统方法的检测性能与稳健的泛化能力。
  • 图  1  DSSS信号生成框架图

    图  2  本文模型检测流程图

    图  3  改进的ResNet-18网络结构图

    图  4  残差块结构图

    图  5  模型训练曲线

    图  6  不同虚警率下的检测性能

    图  7  不同虚警率下模型分类性能

    图  8  有无归一化处理的检测性能对比

    图  9  本文模型与传统方法的检测性能对比

    图  10  不同色噪程度下本文模型的检测性能

    图  11  不同色噪程度下本文模型与传统方法检测性能对比

    表  1  N网络层输出维度

    网络层名称输出特征维度网络层名称输出特征维度
    Input2×2048Layer3-Block2256×256
    Conv164×1024Layer4-Block1512×128
    Layer1-Block164×1024Layer4-Block2512×128
    Layer1-Block264×1024Avgpool512×1
    Layer2-Block1128×512FC512×1
    Layer2-Block2128×512Softmax1×2
    Layer3-Block1256×256Output1×2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  训练参数

    参数
    Initial Learning Rate0.0001
    Max Epochs50
    Mini Batch Size64
    Freeze BNTrue
    Dropout0.3
    OptimizerAdamW
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  模型结构参数消融实验结果

    模型设置$ {P}_{\mathrm{d}} $(-12 dB)$ {P}_{\mathrm{d}} $(-11 dB)$ {P}_{\mathrm{d}} $(-10 dB)$ {P}_{\mathrm{d}} $(-9 dB)$ {P}_{\mathrm{d}} $(-8 dB)达到$ {P}_{\mathrm{d}} $=1所需SNR (dB)
    本文模型30.67%45.33%73.33%89.33%100%-8
    消融模型125.33%38.00%67.33%84.00%97.33%-7
    消融模型223.33%41.33%62.00%86.67%99.33%-7
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] HALDER N and MURTHY C R. Channel estimation and data detection in DS-spread channels: A unified framework, novel algorithms, and waveform comparison[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2025, 73: 4108–4123. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2025.3608021.
    [2] DENG Zhongliang, JIA Buyun, TANG Shihao, et al. Fine frequency acquisition scheme in weak signal environment for a communication and navigation fusion system[J]. Electronics, 2019, 8(8): 829. doi: 10.3390/electronics8080829.
    [3] GUO Wenfei, NIU Xiaoji, GUO Chi, et al. A new FFT acquisition scheme based on partial matched filter in GNSS receivers for harsh environments[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 61: 66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.11.017.
    [4] BORIO D and LACHAPELLE G. A non-coherent architecture for GNSS digital tracking loops[J]. Annals of Telecommunications, 2009, 64(9/10): 601–614. doi: 10.1007/s12243-009-0114-1.
    [5] LIN Mengying, LUO Yimei, ZHU Xuefen, et al. Optimal GPS acquisition algorithm in severe ionospheric scintillation scene[J]. Electronics, 2023, 12(6): 1343. doi: 10.3390/electronics12061343.
    [6] WU Chao, XU Luping, ZHANG Hua, et al. An improved acquisition method for GNSS in high dynamic environments: Differential acquisition based on compressed sensing theory[J]. Navigation, 2017, 64(1): 23–34. doi: 10.1002/navi.173.
    [7] 朱政宇, 殷梦琳, 姚信威, 等. AI赋能的通感算一体化关键技术研究综述[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(10): 3426–3438. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250242.

    ZHU Zhengyu, YIN Menglin, YAO Xinwei, et al. Overview of the research on key technologies for AI-powered integrated sensing, communication and computing[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(10): 3426–3438. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250242.
    [8] 李云, 杨松林, 邢智童, 等. 多尺度特征注意力网络下的卫星信号识别研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(6): 1792–1802. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250126.

    LI Yun, YANG Songlin, XING Zhitong, et al. Study on satellite signal recognition with multi-scale feature attention network[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(6): 1792–1802. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250126.
    [9] 樊盛华, 尹航, 刘俭, 等. 融合双分支优化SAM与全局-局部协同匹配的单样本目标检测方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(12): 4665–4676. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250982.

    FAN Shenghua, YIN Hang, LIU Jian, et al. A one-shot object detection method fusing dual-branch optimized SAM and global-local collaborative matching[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(12): 4665–4676. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250982.
    [10] WEI Fei, ZHENG Shilian, ZHOU Xiaoyu, et al. Detection of direct sequence spread spectrum signals based on deep learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2022, 8(3): 1399–1410. doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2022.3174609.
    [11] BORHANI-DARIAN P, LI Haoqing, WU Peng, et al. Deep learning of GNSS acquisition[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(3): 1566. doi: 10.3390/s23031566.
    [12] MORADI N, NEZHADSHAHBODAGHI M, and MOSAVI M R. GPS signal acquisition based on deep convolutional neural network and post-correlation methods[J]. GPS Solutions, 2023, 27(3): 132. doi: 10.1007/s10291-023-01469-7.
    [13] GU Hanqing, LIU Xiaxia, XU Lu, et al. DSSS signal detection based on CNN[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(15): 6691. doi: 10.3390/s23156691.
    [14] ZHANG Shuang, LIU Feng, HUANG Yuang, et al. Adaptive detection of direct-sequence spread-spectrum signals based on knowledge-enhanced compressive measurements and artificial neural networks[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(7): 2538. doi: 10.3390/s21072538.
    [15] DUAN Lei, LI Chuanjun, and ZHANG Qingpu. Optimizing the computational effort of satellite signal acquisition based on mean recognition convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2493(1): 012001. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2493/1/012001.
    [16] QIU Ye, MA Xinjie, LI Xinglong, et al. An end-to-end approach for enhanced weak signal detection in time–frequency analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2025, 61(6): 19383–19398. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2025.3618514.
    [17] LIU Yang, LIU Peng, SHI Yu, et al. Deep learning-enhanced signal detection for communication systems[J]. PLoS One, 2025, 20(5): e0324916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324916.
    [18] WANG Bo, SHEN Lei, WANG Huaxia, et al. Direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) signal detection based on eigenvalues local binary pattern residual network (EL-ResNet)[J]. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2024, 18(5): 4741–4751. doi: 10.1007/s11760-024-03110-7.
    [19] ZHANG Mingzhen. Communication signal detection technology based on residual neural network and DenseNet[J]. Discover Applied Sciences, 2025, 7(10): 1058. doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-07676-w.
  • 加载中
图(11) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  51
  • HTML全文浏览量:  25
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-04-08
  • 修回日期:  2026-07-28
  • 录用日期:  2026-07-28
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-08-07

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回