Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JIANG Dongmei, TANG Xusheng, LI Bing, ZHANG Qingyu, HE Weiguo. Research on Optimization Methods for Static Random-Access Memory–Physical Unclonable Function Key Extraction[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250551
Citation: JIANG Dongmei, TANG Xusheng, LI Bing, ZHANG Qingyu, HE Weiguo. Research on Optimization Methods for Static Random-Access Memory–Physical Unclonable Function Key Extraction[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250551

Research on Optimization Methods for Static Random-Access Memory–Physical Unclonable Function Key Extraction

doi: 10.11999/JEIT250551 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT250551
  • Received Date: 2025-06-16
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-09-16
  • Available Online: 2025-09-19
  •   Objective  Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) storage keys are exposed to physical attacks, and most lightweight Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices cannot deploy costly protection. A Physical Unclonable Function (PUF) offers a practical defense. However, Static Random-Access Memory PUFs (SRAM-PUFs) used as key generators exhibit environmental sensitivity that degrades stability. Therefore, optimization methods for SRAM-PUF–based key extraction fall into three main categories: (1) circuit-level enhancements that modify the SRAM cell to strengthen its inherent 0/1 bias; (2) cell selection methods that identify and retain only stable cells through dedicated algorithms; and (3) fuzzy-extractor schemes tailored to SRAM-PUFs that correct residual noise to yield reproducible cryptographic keys.  Methods  The selection of SRAM cells can markedly enhance bit stability. However, although reducing the complexity of Error-Correcting Code (ECC) encoding and decoding, this approach requires consuming a large number of stable cells to satisfy key entropy requirements, which in turn increases ECC code length. To address this contradiction, this paper proposes a new key extraction scheme (Figure 2). In the proposed method, SRAM bits are divided into stable and noisy categories. The high entropy of noisy bits is leveraged for key generation: noisy bits are hashed to produce entropy-rich values, whereas stable bits with a low bit error rate are used to generate PUF responses. In the registration stage, the synthesized key is rearranged to form m vectors (R1,R2,…,Rm)according to m different rules. These m vectors are then combined into a new vector R . A repetition code of length 2t+1 (able to correct t errors) is applied to R to generate a codeword C . The codeword C is XORed with the PUF response to obtain helper data w, which is stored in NVM. In the reconstruction stage, w is XORed with a new PUF response to obtain C ′. Due to the repetition coding applied during registration, decoding is performed using a majority decision rule with a threshold of t+1. The decoding result R ' is reshaped into a matrix D with m rows and x columns, followed by reverse interleaving based on the rules used in registration. A majority decision is then executed independently for each column, with a decision threshold of m/2+1. The recovered key is output as the final result.  Results and Discussions  SRAM. Tests at −40 °C, 25 °C, and 85 °C show that the proposed bit-selection algorithm reduces the bit-change rate of SRAM-PUFs, with the number of screenings inversely proportional to the average change rate. The bit-change rate is highest at elevated temperatures. After 20 screenings, the average change rate at 85 °C decreases from 0.14 to 0.07, and after 80 screenings, it further decreases to 0.06. A quantitative analysis of error-correction capability is also performed. Based on the measured bit-change rates at high temperatures, the probability of key reconstruction failure is derived as low as 1.487 6E-9. In addition, 1 024 bytes of SRAM cells are shown to yield entropy keys of 128 bits.  Conclusions  This paper proposes a novel SRAM-PUF key extraction scheme that resolves the trade-off between stability requirements and high entropy demands by employing a bit-selection algorithm. The scheme simplifies error-correction encoding and decoding while enhancing the entropy of the generated keys. Compared with existing approaches, the computational complexity is reduced by 40% relative toScheme 2, by 98.9% relative to Scheme 3, and by 99.12% relative to Scheme 4. Furthermore, the method provides an integrated solution for screening stable SRAM cells, highlighting its practical application potential. Based on the bit error rate of 28 nm SRAM-PUFs, the key reconstruction success rate is calculated as (1-1.4876E-9). In tests conducted at –40 °C, 25 °C, and 85 °C, with 200 key reconstruction attempts per condition, all 11 chips achieved successful reconstruction. Considering variations across different fabrication processes, the number of screening cycles as well as parameters m and t can be adjusted to accommodate other process nodes.
  • loading
  • [1]
    张源, 罗静茹, 张吉良. SDL PUF: 高可靠自适应偏差锁定PUF电路[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(5): 2274–2280. doi: 10.11999/JEIT231313.

    ZHANG Yuan, LUO Jingru, and ZHANG Jiliang. SDL PUF: A high reliability self-adaption deviation locking PUF[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(5): 2274–2280. doi: 10.11999/JEIT231313.
    [2]
    HOLCOMB D E, BURLESON W P, and FU K. Power-up SRAM state as an identifying fingerprint and source of true random numbers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2009, 58(9): 1198–1210. doi: 10.1109/TC.2008.212.
    [3]
    陈帅, 蔡敏, 杨志勇, 等. 嵌入式系统中的内生存储器PUF研究综述[J]. 集成电路与嵌入式系统, 2024, 24(9): 7–16. doi: 10.20193/j.ices2097-4191.2024.0005.

    CHEN Shuai, CAI Min, YANG Zhiyong, et al. Review of extracting intrinsic PUF from embedded memory[J]. Integrated Circuits and Embedded Systems, 2024, 24(9): 7–16. doi: 10.20193/j.ices2097-4191.2024.0005.
    [4]
    RAIKWAL P, GUPTA N, AGARWAL N, et al. Security key generation in SRAM based PUF for cryptographic applications[C]. Proceedings of 2025 Fifth International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies, Bhilai, India, 2025. doi: 10.1109/ICAECT63952.2025.10958966.
    [5]
    TIMOTIUS S I, WANG Yilun, and CHEN H S. An SRAM-based PUF with high native-stability using alternative configuration technique[C]. Proceedings of 2025 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Las Vegas, USA, 2025. doi: 10.1109/ICCE63647.2025.10929913.
    [6]
    LIU Kunyang, PU Hongliang, and SHINOHARA H. A 0.5-V 2.07-fJ/b 497-F2 EE/CMOS hybrid SRAM physically unclonable function with < 1E-7 bit error rate achieved through hot carrier injection burn-in[C]. Proceedings of 2020 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Boston, USA, 2020. doi: 10.1109/CICC48029.2020.9075875.
    [7]
    BATURONE I, PRADA-DELGADO M A, and EIROA S. Improved generation of identifiers, secret keys, and random numbers from SRAMs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2015, 10(12): 2653–2668. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2015.2471279.
    [8]
    陈泽亮, 孔德珠, 尹爱国, 等. 基于数据残留时间的SRAM-PUF预选算法[J]. 电子学报, 2024, 52(5): 1478–1487. doi: 10.12263/DZXB.20221413.

    CHEN Zeliang, KONG Dezhu, YIN Aiguo, et al. SRAM-PUF preselection algorithm based on data remanence time[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2024, 52(5): 1478–1487. doi: 10.12263/DZXB.20221413.
    [9]
    WANG Wendong, SINGH A, GUIN U, et al. Exploiting power supply ramp rate for calibrating cell strength in SRAM PUFs[C]. Proceedings of the 19th Latin-American Test Symposium, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2018: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/LATW.2018.8349685.
    [10]
    SARAZA-CANFLANCA P, CARRASCO-LOPEZ H, SANTANA-ANDREO A, et al. Improving the reliability of SRAM-based PUFs under varying operation conditions and aging degradation[J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2021, 118: 114049. doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2021.114049.
    [11]
    SANTANA-ANDREO A, SARAZA-CANFLANCA P, CASTRO-LOPEZ R, et al. Reliability improvement of SRAM PUFs based on a detailed experimental study into the stochastic effects of aging[J]. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 2024, 176: 155147. doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2024.155147.
    [12]
    HE Ze and LI Shaoqing. A design of key generation unit based on SRAM PUF[C]. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Frontiers of Electronics, Information and Computation Technologies, Wuhan, China, 2022. doi: 10.1109/ICFEICT57213.2022.00032.
    [13]
    张亮亮, 张维, 孙瑞一, 等. 可用于SRAM PUF的密钥提取方案[J]. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 53(6): 997–1002. doi: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2017.059.

    ZHANG Liangliang, ZHANG Wei, SUN Ruiyi, et al. Key extraction schemes for SRAM PUF[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2017, 53(6): 997–1002. doi: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2017.059.
    [14]
    李冰, 涂云晶, 陈帅, 等. 基于SRAM物理不可克隆函数的高效真随机种子发生器设计[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2017, 39(6): 1458–1563. doi: 10.11999/JEIT160835.

    LI Bing, TU Yunjing, CHEN Shuai, et al. Efficient design of truly random seed generator based on SRAM physical unclonable functions[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2017, 39(6): 1458–1463. doi: 10.11999/JEIT160835.
    [15]
    ARM Limited. Arm artisan 28nm SMIC 28HKCP memory power management application[EB/OL]. http://infocenter.arm.com, 2024. (查阅网上资料,请核对网址与文献是否相符).
    [16]
    WANG Y H. On the number of successes in independent trials[J]. Statistica Sinica, 1993, 3(2): 295–312.
    [17]
    周昱, 于宗光. 基于RS和BCH码的SRAM-PUF密钥提取方法及性能分析[J]. 计算机工程, 2024, 50(7): 187–193. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0068443.

    ZHOU Yu and YU Zongguang. SRAM-PUF key extraction method and performance analysis based on RS and BCH codes[J]. Computer Engineering, 2024, 50(7): 187–193. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0068443.
    [18]
    SANTANA-ANDREO A, SARAZA-CANFLANCA P, CARRASCO-LOPEZ H, et al. A DRV-based bit selection method for SRAM PUF key generation and its impact on ECCs[J]. Integration, 2022, 85: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/J.VLSI.2022.02.008.
    [19]
    王新梅, 肖国镇. 纠错码——原理与方法[M]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社, 2001: 242–290.

    WANG Xinmei and XIAO Guozhen. Town Error Correction Coding - Principles and Methods[M]. Xi'an: Xidian University Press, 2001: 242–290. (查阅网上资料, 未找到对应的英文翻译, 请确认).
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (29) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return