高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

融合动态图递归与状态空间的时空耦合交通流预测模型

张红 齐方正 雒生俊 张玺君 侯亮 黄海蓉

张红, 齐方正, 雒生俊, 张玺君, 侯亮, 黄海蓉. 融合动态图递归与状态空间的时空耦合交通流预测模型[J]. 电子与信息学报. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251198
引用本文: 张红, 齐方正, 雒生俊, 张玺君, 侯亮, 黄海蓉. 融合动态图递归与状态空间的时空耦合交通流预测模型[J]. 电子与信息学报. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251198
ZHANG Hong, QI Fangzheng, LUO Shengjun, ZHANG Xijun, HOU Liang, HUANG Hairong. A Spatiotemporal Coupling Traffic Flow Prediction Model with Dynamic Graph Recursion and State Space[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251198
Citation: ZHANG Hong, QI Fangzheng, LUO Shengjun, ZHANG Xijun, HOU Liang, HUANG Hairong. A Spatiotemporal Coupling Traffic Flow Prediction Model with Dynamic Graph Recursion and State Space[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251198

融合动态图递归与状态空间的时空耦合交通流预测模型

doi: 10.11999/JEIT251198 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT251198
基金项目: 甘肃省重点人才项目(2024RCXM57),甘肃省科技重大专项计划(25ZYJA037),国家自然科学基金(62566036)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张红:女,博士,副教授,研究方向为智能交通、图神经网络建模及运用、大数据分析

    齐方正:男,硕士,研究方向为智能交通

    雒生俊:男,本科,研究方向为大数据分析

    张玺君:男,博士,副教授,研究方向为大数据分析、智能交通

    侯亮:男,硕士,讲师,研究方向为智能交通

    黄海蓉:女,硕士,研究方向为智能交通

    通讯作者:

    张红 zhanghong@lut.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: XXXX

A Spatiotemporal Coupling Traffic Flow Prediction Model with Dynamic Graph Recursion and State Space

  • 摘要: 准确的交通流预测是智能交通系统中的关键任务,其核心挑战在于如何有效捕捉城市路网中动态演化的空间结构以及复杂的时空相关关系。针对现有方法在建模交通路网的动态关联时难以自适应捕捉路网空间依赖特征,对空间特征表征能力有限,且计算效率低等问题,本文提出一种融合动态图递归与状态空间的时空交通流预测模型(DGGRU-Mamba)。该模型构建了时空嵌入生成器,将节点的空间位置信息与周期性时间特征联合编码,以增强图结构对交通流时间特征的感知能力;设计了动态图递归建模(DGRM),通过多层动态图门控递归单元(DGGRU)动态构建邻接关系,捕捉路网交通状态演变引发的空间依赖性;建立了基于结构化状态转移机制的时空Mamba(ST-Mamba),实现交通流的全局时序建模,在提升建模能力的同时降低计算开销。相较主流自注意力模型STAEformer和DGGRU-Mamba,模型在PEMS04数据集上的MAE、RMSE和MAPE分别降低约4.2%、3.8%和2.9%,同时推理时间缩短约4.82s,在提升预测精度的同时提高了计算效率。
  • 图  1  融合动态图递归与状态空间的时空交通流预测模型(DGGRU-Mamba)

    图  2  DGRM中的动态图结构构建示意图

    图  3  动态图门控递归单元结构图

    图  4  时空Mamba(ST-Mamba)结构示意图

    图  5  数据集PEMS04上预测误差随预测步长变化趋势

    图  6  DGGRU-Mamba在PEMS04、PEMS08数据集上的消融实验误差比较

    图  7  DGGRU-Mamba在三个数据集上的训练损失曲线、验证损失曲线与测试损失曲线

    图  8  不同嵌入维度设置下DGGRU-Mamba模型在PEMS04与PEMS08数据集上的MAE与RMSE表现

    表  1  数据集详细信息

    数据集节点时间跨度Samples步长(min)类型
    PEMS033582018.092018.1126,2085流量
    PEMS043072018.012018.0216,9925流量
    PEMS078832017.052017.0828,2245流量
    PEMS081702016.072016.0817,8565流量
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  对比实验

    模型PEMS03PEMS04PEMS07PEMS08
    MAERMSEMAPE(%)MAERMSEMAPE(%)MAERMSEMAPE(%)MAERMSEMAPE(%)
    STGCN17.5530.4217.3421.1634.8913.8325.3339.3411.2117.5027.0911.29
    AGCRN15.9828.2515.2319.2732.2612.9222.2736.559.1219.0525.229.54
    DCRNN17.9930.3118.3421.2233.4414.1725.2238.6111.8216.8226.3610.92
    GWN19.1232.7718.8924.8939.6617.2926.3941.5011.9718.2830.0512.15
    STG-NCDE15.5926.6814.9919.4231.3412.9820.7835.008.9516.3425.5110.26
    STGOOE15.5626.6414.9618.9130.3212.9120.3235.438.9016.3425.4410.58
    ASTGCN(r)17.3429.5617.2122.9235.2216.5624.0137.8710.7318.2528.0611.64
    STNorm15.3225.9314.3718.9630.9812.6920.5034.668.7515.4124.779.76
    GMAN16.8727.9218.2319.1431.6013.1920.9734.109.0515.3124.9210.13
    STAEformer15.0525.5514.9118.8530.8512.5520.2534.208.6515.1024.509.92
    PDFormer14.8525.3514.7518.6530.7012.4520.0533.958.5514.9124.209.75
    DGGRU-Mamba14.5725.0614.6118.3730.4912.2919.7533.408.3114.5123.869.45
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  消融实验

    模型PEMS04PEMS08
    MAERMSEMAPE(%)MAERMSEMAPE(%)
    w/o DGRM18.8531.3912.7415.1424.9210.01
    w/o Backcast18.7531.1912.6415.0424.729.91
    w/o ST-Mamba19.0231.5912.8115.3125.1210.08
    w/o STE18.6631.0412.5514.9524.579.82
    DGGRU-Mamba18.3730.4912.2914.5123.869.45
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  训练与推理时间

    数据、时间、模型STG-NCDESTSGCNAGCRNSTGODEGWNSTAEformerPDFormerDGGRU-Mamba
    PEMS04训练时间(秒/轮)118.6181.96.535.232.1892.61108.3221.37
    推理时间(秒)12.34.61.14.13.46.47.11.58
    PEMS08训练时间(秒/轮)43.261.283.922.310.6474.2286.8517.99
    推理时间(秒)4.312.40.52.11.25.15.81.7
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 张红, 伊敏, 张玺君, 等. 长期Transformer和自适应傅里叶变换的动态图卷积交通流预测研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(7): 2249–2262. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241076.

    ZHANG Hong, YI Min, ZHANG Xijun, et al. Long-term Transformer and adaptive Fourier transform for dynamic graph convolutional traffic flow prediction study[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(7): 2249–2262. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241076.
    [2] 智慧, 段苗苗, 杨利霞, 等. 一种基于区块链和联邦学习融合的交通流预测方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(9): 3777–3787. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240030.

    ZHI Hui, DUAN Miaomiao, YANG Lixia, et al. A traffic flow prediction method based on the fusion of blockchain and federated learning[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(9): 3777–3787. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240030.
    [3] 殷礼胜, 刘攀, 孙双晨, 等. 基于互补集合经验模态分解和改进麻雀搜索算法优化双向门控循环单元的交通流组合预测模型[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2023, 45(12): 4499–4508. doi: 10.11999/JEIT221172.

    YIN Lisheng, LIU Pan, SUN Shuangchen, et al. Traffic flow combined prediction model based on complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition and bidirectional gated recurrent unit optimized by improved sparrow search algorithm[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2023, 45(12): 4499–4508. doi: 10.11999/JEIT221172.
    [4] ZHANG Qingyong, LI Changwu, SU Fuwen, et al. Spatiotemporal residual graph attention network for traffic flow forecasting[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023, 10(13): 11518–11532. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3243122.
    [5] LI Biyue, LI Zhishuai, CHEN Jun, et al. MAST-GNN: A multimodal adaptive spatio-temporal graph neural network for airspace complexity prediction[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2024, 160: 104521. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2024.104521.
    [6] LI Zhuolin, ZHANG Gaowei, YU Jie, et al. Dynamic graph structure learning for multivariate time series forecasting[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2023, 138: 109423. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109423.
    [7] WU Di, PENG Kai, WANG Shangguang, et al. Spatial–temporal graph attention gated recurrent transformer network for traffic flow forecasting[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11(8): 14267–14281. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3340182.
    [8] LIU Shipeng and WANG Xingjian. An improved transformer based traffic flow prediction model[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 8284. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92425-7.
    [9] SHAO Zhiqi, WANG Ze, YAO Xusheng, et al. ST-MambaSync: Complement the power of mamba and transformer fusion for less computational cost in spatial-temporal traffic forecasting[J]. Information Fusion, 2025, 117: 102872. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102872.
    [10] LI Yaguang, YU R, SHAHABI C, et al. Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting[C]. The 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, Vancouver, Canada, 2018: 1–16. (查阅网上资料, 未找到本条文献页码信息, 请确认).
    [11] GUO Shengnan, LIN Youfang, FENG Ning, et al. Attention based spatial-temporal graph convolutional networks for traffic flow forecasting[C]. Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Honolulu, USA, 2019: 922–929. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301922.
    [12] YE Yaqin, XIAO Yue, ZHOU Yuxuan, et al. Dynamic multi-graph neural network for traffic flow prediction incorporating traffic accidents[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 234: 121101. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121101.
    [13] ZHENG Chuanpan, FAN Xiaoliang, WANG Cheng, et al. GMAN: A graph multi-attention network for traffic prediction[C]. Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, USA, 2020: 1234–1241. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5477.
    [14] DENG Jinliang, CHEN Xiusi, JIANG Renhe, et al. ST-norm: Spatial and temporal normalization for multi-variate time series forecasting[C]. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Singapore, 2021: 269–278. doi: 10.1145/3447548.3467330. (查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献出版城市信息,请确认).
    [15] SHAO Zhiqi, BELL M G H, WANG Ze, et al. St-mamba: Spatial-temporal selective state space model for traffic flow prediction[EB/OL]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13257, 2024.
    [16] CHOI J, KIM H, AN M, et al. SpoT-mamba: Learning long-range dependency on spatio-temporal graphs with selective state spaces[C]. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Spatio-Temporal Reasoning and Learning (STRL 2024) co-located with the 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Jeju island, Korea, 2024.
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  20
  • HTML全文浏览量:  9
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 修回日期:  2026-04-17
  • 录用日期:  2026-04-17
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-04-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回