For Electric Power Disaster Early Warning Scenarios: A Large Model and Lightweight Models Joint Deployment Scheme Based on Limited Spectrum Resources
-
摘要: 面向电力灾害预警场景，传统针对不同场景设计专有、独立预警系统的方式存在数据采集冗余和开发成本高昂问题。为提高预警精度并降低成本，基于AI大模型的综合预警系统是未来研究的主要方向之一，但大模型通常需要部署在云侧，而无线频谱资源限制使得所有数据上传至云侧面临挑战。通过将模型规模大幅压缩获得轻量模型并在端侧部署，可绕过频谱资源受限瓶颈，但这不可避免地会降低模型性能。为此，该文提出一种基于云-端协同的大模型与轻量模型联合部署方案：在云侧部署高精度大模型处理复杂任务，在端侧部署轻量模型处理简单任务，并通过可信阈值实现任务分流；在此基础上，该文引入功率域非正交多址技术，使得多个终端可共享同一时频资源，进而通过增加云侧处理任务比例提高系统检测精度；然后针对仅考虑上行共享信道带宽约束场景、以及同时考虑终端接入碰撞约束与共享信道带宽约束场景，分别设计给定带宽时系统可支持的最大终端数量求解算法和检测准确率最优的可信阈值求解算法。数值结果表明，所提方案在系统可支持终端数量、检测精度方面显著优于多种对比方案，验证了所提方案的有效性和优越性。Abstract:
Objective Traditional approaches to electric power disaster early warning rely on dedicated, scenario-specific systems, leading to redundant data collection and high development costs. To enhance accuracy and reduce costs, comprehensive early warning frameworks based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) large models have become an important research direction. However, large models are typically deployed in the cloud, and limited wireless spectrum resources constrain the uploading of complete data streams. Deploying lightweight models at terminal devices through substantial model compression can alleviate spectrum limitations but inevitably compromises model performance. Methods To address these limitations, this study proposes a cloud–terminal collaborative joint deployment scheme integrating large and lightweight models. In this framework, a high-precision large model is deployed in the cloud to process complex tasks, whereas lightweight models are deployed at terminal devices to handle simple tasks. Task offloading decisions are governed by a confidence threshold that dynamically determines whether computation occurs locally or in the cloud. A power-domain Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) technique is incorporated to allow multiple terminals to share identical time–frequency resources, thereby improving system detection accuracy by increasing the proportion of tasks processed in the cloud. Additionally, for scenarios considering (i) only uplink shared-channel bandwidth constraints and (ii) both terminal access collision constraints and shared-channel bandwidth constraints, corresponding algorithms are developed to determine the maximum number of terminals supported under a given bandwidth and to identify the optimal confidence threshold that maximizes detection accuracy. Results and Discussions (1) As shown in Figures 3 (a) and 3(b), when the uplink shared-channel bandwidth $ W $ increases, the number of supported terminals rises for both the proposed scheme and the orthogonal multiple access (OMA)-based scheme. This occurs because a larger $ W $ enables more terminals with low-confidence detection results to upload raw data to the cloud for further processing, thereby enhancing detection accuracy and reducing the missed detection rate. (2) In contrast, the number of supported terminals $ M $ in the pure on-device processing scheme remains constant with varying $ W $, as this scheme relies entirely on the lightweight model deployed at the terminal and is therefore independent of bandwidth. (3) Compared with the OMA-based and pure on-device schemes, the proposed approach markedly increases the number of supported terminals, confirming that non-orthogonal reuse of time–frequency resources and cloud–terminal collaborative deployment of large and lightweight models are key to improving system performance. (4) As shown inTable 3 , an increase in the number of preambles reduces the probability of terminal access collisions, allowing more terminals to successfully transmit raw data to the cloud for detection. Therefore, the missed detection rate decreases, and overall detection accuracy improves.Conclusions For electric power disaster early warning scenarios, this study integrates power-domain NOMA and proposes a cloud–terminal collaborative deployment scheme combining a large model with lightweight models. By dynamically determining whether tasks are processed locally by a lightweight model or in the cloud by a large model, the system achieves optimized detection accuracy and a reduced missed detection rate. Numerical results indicate that, under given uplink shared-channel bandwidth, minimum detection accuracy, and maximum missed detection rate, the introduction of power-domain NOMA effectively increases the number of supported terminals. Furthermore, when both terminal access collision constraints and shared-channel bandwidth constraints are considered, optimizing the confidence threshold to regulate the number of terminals transmitting data to the cloud further enhances detection accuracy and reduces the missed detection rate. -
表 1 数学符号表
符号 含义 符号 含义 $ \mathcal{S} $ 基站集合 $ \mathcal{M} $ 终端集合 $ {\mathcal{M}}_{s} $ 基站s覆盖区域内终端集合 $ \alpha $ 典型数据概率 $ {P}_{\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{c},s,m}^{\left(\tau \right)} $ 终端m本地检测准确率 $ {P}_{\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{c},c}^{\left(\tau \right)} $ 云服务器检测准确率 $ W $ 上行共享信道总带宽 $ \mathrm{\beta } $ 异常数据概率 $ {\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{b}} $ 子信道带宽 $ {\mu }_{s,m}^{\left(\tau \right)} $ 本地轻量模型检测指示变量 $ {\varGamma }_{\mathrm{P}} $ 可信阈值 $ {\nu }_{s,m}^{\left(\tau \right)} $ 异常数据指示变量 $ {\varGamma }_{\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{c}} $ 最小检测准确率阈值 $ {\varGamma }_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}} $ 最大漏报率阈值 $ {\xi }_{s,m}^{\left(\tau \right)} $ 终端接入碰撞指示变量 $ K $ 前导码数量 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 仿真参数设置
参数 值 参数 值 基站数量$ \mathrm{S} $ 3 典型数据概率$ \mathrm{\alpha } $ {0.9,0.8} 子信道带宽$ {\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{b}} $ 2 MHz 异常数据概率$ \mathrm{\beta } $ 0.1 $ {\mathrm{L}\mathrm{B}}_{1}^{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{v}},{\mathrm{U}\mathrm{B}}_{1}^{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{v}},{\mathrm{L}\mathrm{B}}_{2}^{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{v}},{\mathrm{U}\mathrm{B}}_{2}^{\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{v}} $ 0.96,0.98,0.90,0.96 精度$ {\mathrm{\epsilon }}_{\mathrm{M}} $ 1 $ {\mathrm{L}\mathrm{B}}_{1}^{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}},{\mathrm{U}\mathrm{B}}_{1}^{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}},{\mathrm{L}\mathrm{B}}_{2}^{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}},{\mathrm{U}\mathrm{B}}_{2}^{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}} $ 0.995,1.000,0.990,0.995 粒子数$ \mathrm{N} $ 20 惯性权重$ \mathrm{\omega } $ 0.5 学习因子$ {\mathrm{c}}_{1},{\mathrm{c}}_{2} $ 2,2 仿真周期数$ {\mathrm{\tau }}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}} $ 1000 最大迭代次数$ I $ 200
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 前导码数量对系统性能影响
前导码
数量所提方案 基于OMA的
方案纯端侧处理
方案可信阈值
随机方案所提方案 基于OMA的
方案纯端侧处理
方案可信阈值
随机方案适应值($ {{\varGamma }}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}=0.01 $) 适应值($ {{\varGamma }}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}}=0.02 $) 10 $ - $ 0.0028 $ - $ 0.0028 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0183 0.9657 0.9657 $ - $ 0.0106 0.0691 20 $ - $ 0.0016 $ - $ 0.0016 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0171 0.9679 0.9679 $ - $ 0.0106 0.1190 30 $ - $ 0.0001 $ - $ 0.0026 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0162 0.9674 0.9667 $ - $ 0.0106 0.1005 40 0.9666 $ - $ 0.0004 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0155 0.9725 0.9667 $ - $ 0.0106 0.1597 50 0.9701 0.9653 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0149 0.9796 0.9677 $ - $ 0.0106 0.1992 60 0.9767 0.9617 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0144 0.9816 0.9687 $ - $ 0.0106 0.1707 70 0.9793 0.9663 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0142 0.9811 0.9677 $ - $ 0.0106 0.2293 80 0.9794 0.9611 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0138 0.9826 0.9693 $ - $ 0.0106 0.2979 90 0.9826 0.9659 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0137 0.9823 0.9680 $ - $ 0.0106 0.2884 100 0.9817 0.9626 $ - $ 0.0206 $ - $ 0.0132 0.9820 0.9689 $ - $ 0.0106 0.2791
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 终端数量与前导码数量比值对终端接入碰撞概率影响
前导码数量 终端数量 比值 碰撞概率 20 10 0.5:1 0.3698 20 20 1:1 0.6226 20 40 2:1 0.8647 20 60 3:1 0.9515 20 80 4:1 0.9826 20 100 5:1 0.9938 20 120 6:1 0.9978 20 140 7:1 0.9992 20 160 8:1 0.9997 20 180 9:1 0.9999 20 200 10:1 ≈1
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 高建丰, 王焱, 金卷华. 基于QPSO-BP神经网络的火灾预警算法[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2020, 39(10): 1345–1349. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2020.10.004.GAO Jianfeng, WANG Yan, and JIN Juanhua. Fire early warning algorithm based on QPSO-BP neural network[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(10): 1345–1349. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2020.10.004. [2] ABDALZAHER M S, ELSAYED H A, FOUDA M M, et al. Employing machine learning and IoT for earthquake early warning system in smart cities[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(1): 495. doi: 10.3390/en16010495. [3] 窦杰, 向子林, 许强, 等. 机器学习在滑坡智能防灾减灾中的应用与发展趋势[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(5): 1657–1674. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.419.DOU Jie, XIANG Zilin, XU Qiang, et al. Application and development trend of machine learning in landslide intelligent disaster prevention and mitigation[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(5): 1657–1674. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.419. [4] SANDERSON K. GPT-4 is here: What scientists think[J]. Nature, 2023, 615(7954): 773. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00816-5. [5] 李刚, 方鸿, 刘云鹏, 等. 新型电力系统中的大模型驱动技术: 现状、机遇与挑战[J]. 高电压技术, 2024, 50(7): 2864–2878. doi: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20240863.LI Gang, FANG Hong, LIU Yunpeng, et al. Large-model drive technology in new power system: Status, challenges and prospects[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2024, 50(7): 2864–2878. doi: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20240863. [6] 车万翔, 窦志成, 冯岩松, 等. 大模型时代的自然语言处理: 挑战、机遇与发展[J]. 中国科学: 信息科学, 2023, 53(9): 1645–1687. doi: 10.1360/SSI-2023-0113.CHE Wanxiang, DOU Zhicheng, FENG Yansong, et al. Towards a comprehensive understanding of the impact of large language models on natural language processing: Challenges, opportunities and future directions[J]. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2023, 53(9): 1645–1687. doi: 10.1360/SSI-2023-0113. [7] 李莉, 时榕良, 郭旭, 等. 融合大模型与图神经网络的电力设备缺陷诊断[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2024, 18(10): 2643–2655. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2405085.LI Li, SHI Rongliang, GUO Xu, et al. Diagnosis of power system defects by large language models and graph neural networks[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2024, 18(10): 2643–2655. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1673-9418.2405085. [8] DETTMERS T, LEWIS M, BELKADA Y, et al. GPT3. int8(): 8-bit matrix multiplication for transformers at scale[C]. Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, New Orleans, USA, 2022: 30318–30332. [9] XIAO Guangxuan, LIN Ji, SEZNEC M, et al. SmoothQuant: Accurate and efficient post-training quantization for large language models[C]. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, Honolulu, USA, 2023: 38087–38099. [10] XIA Haojun, ZHENG Zhen, LI Yuchao, et al. Flash-LLM: Enabling cost-effective and highly-efficient large generative model inference with unstructured sparsity[J]. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2023, 17(2): 211–224. doi: 10.14778/3626292.3626303. [11] HU E J, SHEN Yelong, WALLIS P, et al. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models[C]. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022: 3. (查阅网上资料, 未找到对应的出版地信息, 请确认). [12] LI Sunzhu, ZHANG Peng, GAN Guobing, et al. Hypoformer: Hybrid decomposition transformer for edge-friendly neural machine translation[C]. Proceedings of 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2022: 7056–7068. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.475. [13] GU Yuxian, DONG Li, WEI Furu, et al. MiniLLM: Knowledge distillation of large language models[C]. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations, Vienna, Austria, 2024. [14] ZHANG Shubin, TONG Xun, CHI Kaikai, et al. Stackelberg game-based multi-agent algorithm for resource allocation and task offloading in MEC-enabled C-ITS[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2025.3553487. (查阅网上资料,未找到对应的卷期页码信息,请确认). [15] DAI Linglong, WANG Bichai, DING Zhiguo, et al. A survey of non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2018, 20(3): 2294–2323. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2835558. [16] SHI Zhenjiang and LIU Jiajia. A novel NOMA-enhanced SDT scheme for NR RedCap in 5G/B5G systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2024, 23(4): 3190–3204. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2023.3306342. [17] BYERS R. A bisection method for measuring the distance of a stable matrix to the unstable matrices[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 1988, 9(5): 875–881. doi: 10.1137/0909059. [18] KENNEDY J and EBERHART R. Particle swarm optimization[C]. Proceedings of the ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, 1995: 1942–1948. doi: 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968. [19] WANG Yichen, WANG Tao, YANG Zihuan, et al. Throughput-oriented non-orthogonal random access scheme for massive MTC networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2020, 68(3): 1777–1793. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2019.2957767. [20] SHI Zhenjiang and LIU Jiajia. Massive access in 5G and beyond ultra-dense networks: An MARL-based NORA scheme[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2023, 71(4): 2170–2183. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2023.3244958. -
图(4) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 13
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
